<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Recommendation for Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/google-recommends-live-search-for-searching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/google-recommends-live-search-for-searching/</link>
	<description>Blog about Search Engine Optimization and Internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neelu</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/google-recommends-live-search-for-searching/#comment-4013</link>
		<dc:creator>Neelu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/google-recommends-live-search-for-searching/#comment-4013</guid>
		<description>Good post, but have you thought about Google Recommendation for Search before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, but have you thought about Google Recommendation for Search before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/google-recommends-live-search-for-searching/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/google-recommends-live-search-for-searching/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I dare say that the #10 result, http://www.cnn.com/SEARCH/ is almost spamming Google with its 33 instances of &quot;search&quot; on the page. The keyword density for this is 6.85%!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dare say that the #10 result, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/SEARCH/">http://www.cnn.com/SEARCH/</a> is almost spamming Google with its 33 instances of &#8220;search&#8221; on the page. The keyword density for this is 6.85%!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

