<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia is Still Useful for SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/</link>
	<description>Blog about Search Engine Optimization and Internet marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Carroll</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-4053</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-4053</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is not scraped, and it doesn&#039;t take a &quot;blackhat&quot; to get content off of wikipedia. It is the open encyclopedia because it is totally free, and legal, to fork wikipedia entirely! The software is mediawiki, and the database to load it is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_database

Answers.com, isn&#039;t doing anything special -- more than likely they&#039;re just rendering wikipedia pages from a clone of the wikipedia database, and their link template is borked. (the [] operator in mediawiki)

And re:Will there is no evidence that Citizendium will be any more accurate, or have a greater content:trash ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is not scraped, and it doesn&#8217;t take a &#8220;blackhat&#8221; to get content off of wikipedia. It is the open encyclopedia because it is totally free, and legal, to fork wikipedia entirely! The software is mediawiki, and the database to load it is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_database">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_database</a></p>
<p>Answers.com, isn&#8217;t doing anything special &#8212; more than likely they&#8217;re just rendering wikipedia pages from a clone of the wikipedia database, and their link template is borked. (the [] operator in mediawiki)</p>
<p>And re:Will there is no evidence that Citizendium will be any more accurate, or have a greater content:trash ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search24online</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator>Search24online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>wikipedia helps in SEO a lot ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wikipedia helps in SEO a lot &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3082</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3082</guid>
		<description>I often use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickfound.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Position Tool&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often use the <a href="http://www.clickfound.com">Google Position Tool</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Google Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Google Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>Keep up the great work ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the great work <img src='http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3068</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3068</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s kind of a simple deal - you contribute something of value to humanity, and you get paid.&quot;

Except that anyone can take your link away no matter how helpful or relevant it is.  External sources are less likely to be removed on Citizendium.org, a wiki encyclopedia that many are turning to instead of Wikipedia. Its growth is in a steady upswing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s kind of a simple deal &#8211; you contribute something of value to humanity, and you get paid.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except that anyone can take your link away no matter how helpful or relevant it is.  External sources are less likely to be removed on Citizendium.org, a wiki encyclopedia that many are turning to instead of Wikipedia. Its growth is in a steady upswing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexx</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>The best thing to do is to actually create content that has real value to the subject itself.  Then, not only will your wiki link stick, but you will also get traffic from it.
It&#039;s kind of a simple deal - you contribute something of value to humanity, and you get paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing to do is to actually create content that has real value to the subject itself.  Then, not only will your wiki link stick, but you will also get traffic from it.<br />
It&#8217;s kind of a simple deal &#8211; you contribute something of value to humanity, and you get paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schmuck</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>Schmuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>I agree that wikipedia is really useful in SEO. But it is the wrong way to copy its contents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that wikipedia is really useful in SEO. But it is the wrong way to copy its contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>@Murthy, do you have any evidence that SEO companies were the ones doing the spamming opposed to just individual spammers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Murthy, do you have any evidence that SEO companies were the ones doing the spamming opposed to just individual spammers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murthy Rao</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Murthy Rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>Really Wikipedia has been made more difficult by the spamming practices of many SEO companies, but this makes a link from Wikipedia all the more precious because of this on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Wikipedia has been made more difficult by the spamming practices of many SEO companies, but this makes a link from Wikipedia all the more precious because of this on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigoakinc.com/blog/wikipedia-is-still-useful-for-seo/#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>Great post - I set my wiki account up a few days ago, but was pondering this exact issue.  I&#039;m headed over there now to get to work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; I set my wiki account up a few days ago, but was pondering this exact issue.  I&#8217;m headed over there now to get to work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

